| Welcome! | About Us | Archived Articles | References & Research | Links |
Recent Entries
Check out www.LimitEminentDomain.org
Imminently concerned: A local view of eminent domain Cupertino's land use shot heard far and wide Eminent Domain Project at Standstill Despite Ruling Blight Makes Right: October 26, San Diego Eminent Domain in N.J. - Now They Just Steal Land Senate & Assembly Committee Joint Interim Hearing on Redevelopment & Blight. Weingart City Heights Library, S.D. PROPERTIES THROUGHOUT MOST OF BERKELEY LIKELY TO BE SUBJECT TO "TAKING" BY EMINENT DOMAIN Senate bill would blunt property ruling Conference on Redevelopment Abuse
Archives
January 2006
November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004
Syndicate News
Contact Info
|
:: RETURN TO FRONTPAGE NEWS ::
June 23, 2005Don't Like the Supreme Court Decision.....Senator Tom McClintock released the following statement on the United States Supreme Court decision in Kelo v. City of New London, Connecticut. McClintock to introduce an amendment to the "Today the U.S. Supreme Court broke the social compact by striking down one of Americans' most fundamental rights. Their decision nullifies the Constitution's Public Use clause and opens an era when the rich and powerful may use government to seize the property of ordinary citizens for private gain." "The responsibility now falls on the various states to reassert and restore the property rights of their citizens. I am today announcing my intention to introduce an amendment to the California Constitution to restore the original meaning of the property protections in the Bill of Rights. This amendment will require that the government must either own the property it seizes through eminent domain or guarantee the public the legal right to use the property. In addition, it will require that such property must be restored to the original owner or his rightful successor, if the government ceased to use it for the purpose of the eminent domain action." Posted by Coalition Webbies at June 23, 2005 05:53 PM |
