Welcome! About Us Archived Articles References & Research Links  
March 2006

Sun

Mon

Tue

Wed

Thu

Fri

Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Recent Entries

Check out www.LimitEminentDomain.org

Imminently concerned: A local view of eminent domain

Cupertino's land use shot heard far and wide

Eminent Domain Project at Standstill Despite Ruling

Blight Makes Right: October 26, San Diego

Eminent Domain in N.J. - Now They Just Steal Land

Senate & Assembly Committee Joint Interim Hearing on Redevelopment & Blight. Weingart City Heights Library, S.D.

PROPERTIES THROUGHOUT MOST OF BERKELEY LIKELY TO BE SUBJECT TO "TAKING" BY EMINENT DOMAIN

Senate bill would blunt property ruling

Conference on Redevelopment Abuse

Archives

January 2006
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
Syndicate News
(XML) Feed Available Here
Contact Info
P.O.Box 446
San Jose, California. 95103

(408) 817-5678
email at: c2r_coalition@yahoo.com
:: RETURN TO FRONTPAGE NEWS ::

March 27, 2005

San Jose also seeks public records

March 27, 2005
Internal Affairs - San Jose Mercury News

It's always interesting when an attorney complains of legal harassment. That's what Santa Clara County's top lawyer, Ann Ravel, says San Jose is committing as the city presses ahead with its lawsuit to block the county's fairgrounds theater project.

Ravel says the city's latest request for information -- down to the driver's license -- about every county official who years ago helped negotiate a land-use policy now at the heart of the theater dispute is just a naked attempt to bury her office in busywork.

``It's apparent to me that this is solely for the purpose of harassment,'' Ravel said. ``They are abusing the process of the court.''

San Jose, which fears the fairgrounds theater will hurt chances for a downtown music venue, claims a 1983 land-use agreement revised in 1993 and 2001 required Santa Clara County to get the city's OK on the project.

Ravel says the city's request is a waste of government time and taxpayer resources because the city has its own records of the joint meetings on the land-use policy. And the dispute is more over the nature of the fairgrounds theater project than the intent of the land-use agreement, she said.

``The city was a participant in all those conversations,'' Ravel said. ``Every meeting involved city staff and county staff. They're asking us to get an enormous amount of information they already have. And not only that, they don't really need it.''

San Jose City Attorney Rick Doyle said he was ``dumbfounded'' by Ravel's complaint, and that the county has made similar requests.

``We're trying to get to the intent around this provision, which is the heart of this case,'' Doyle said. ``There's nothing vexatious or abusive.''

No trial date has been set, but the feuding lawyers are scheduled to appear before a mediator April 26 to try to settle the case. Interestingly, some players in this drama have swapped sides. Doyle notes that Ron Gonzales signed the policy's 1993 revision as county board chairman and its 2001 version as San Jose mayor. Jim Beall signed the 1993 version as a San Jose councilman and the 2001 revision as a county supervisor.

Marketing approach for chief job flops

http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/local/11243338.htm


Posted by Coalition Webbies at March 27, 2005 07:00 AM
©2003 Coalition for Redevelopment Reform. All rights reserved. Site by Rasteroids Design