Welcome! About Us Archived Articles References & Research Links  
November 2006

Sun

Mon

Tue

Wed

Thu

Fri

Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    
Recent Entries

Check out www.LimitEminentDomain.org

Imminently concerned: A local view of eminent domain

Cupertino's land use shot heard far and wide

Eminent Domain Project at Standstill Despite Ruling

Blight Makes Right: October 26, San Diego

Eminent Domain in N.J. - Now They Just Steal Land

Senate & Assembly Committee Joint Interim Hearing on Redevelopment & Blight. Weingart City Heights Library, S.D.

PROPERTIES THROUGHOUT MOST OF BERKELEY LIKELY TO BE SUBJECT TO "TAKING" BY EMINENT DOMAIN

Senate bill would blunt property ruling

Conference on Redevelopment Abuse

Archives

January 2006
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
Syndicate News
(XML) Feed Available Here
Contact Info
P.O.Box 446
San Jose, California. 95103

(408) 817-5678
email at: c2r_coalition@yahoo.com
:: RETURN TO FRONTPAGE NEWS ::

July 17, 2004

Political Games: Redevelopment Wins You Lose

by Douglas Adams McNea

There is a high stakes game of chicken being played out in the state Capitol
with your tax dollars as the prize. If we the people do not take action,
redevelopment wins, we loose.

The three proposed plans are as follows:

A) Original Local Gov. Agreement
B) Local Government Compromise
C) SCA 9 - Democrat Proposal

So what plan do we support?

Dan Weintraub laid out our best course of action when he said:

"Instead of making a mistake that will haunt California for years to come,
the governor should return to his original proposal, shift local money to
the state for one year only, and let the cities and counties make their case
to the voters in November.

If the public likes their solution, state officials will have to live with
it. But if Proposition 65 loses, Schwarzenegger can begin the next day to
put together the kind of real reform worthy of his power and prestige, a
reform that would cement his legacy on an important and difficult issue. "

For full text:
Govenor is Missing a Chance to Enact Big Reform

We need to tell the Governor to flex his muscle by returning to his original
proposal. Tell the Governor to oppose Proposition 65. Then start forming a
strong alliance to defeat Proposition 65. We need to say no to the
California Redevelopment Association and their plan to use Proposition 65,
the Governor, and the Legislators to protect tax increment from being
shifted to education.

What is more important corporate welfare or the welfare of are children?

Contact the Govenor


Posted by Coalition Webbies at July 17, 2004 01:19 PM
©2003 Coalition for Redevelopment Reform. All rights reserved. Site by Rasteroids Design